Altenergy

Vertical Axis Wind Turbine (VAWT) Project

posted Saturday, 24 February 2007

Not all wind turbines are like the conventional "wind mills" with a horizontal shaft. There is also the vertical axis wind turbine, or VAWT, that operates like an anemometer, the device used to measure windspeed. This project has taken quite a bit of time. You can see a previous blog entry that described the fabrication of the aluminum "wings."

Now the wings are attached to an aluminum cross piece and held rigidly in place with a system of hardened steel tubes that slip through holes in the ribs and the ends of the cross piece. The outside diameter is 8 feet. The height of the wings is 6 feet. The rectangular area of 48 square feet converts to about 4.46 square meters. The turbine is connected to a permanent magnet alternator by means of a chain and sprocket that uses a 5:1 ratio.

The alternator has two 12 inch diameter rotors that each have 12 neodymium disk magnets measuring 1.47 inche in diameter and .6 inches thick. Between the rotors is the stator consisting of 9 coils of awg #20 wire, 200 turns each. The coils are arranged to produce 3-phase ac. Each phase has 3 coils wired in series. There are 3 full wave bridge rectifiers, one for each phase. Each is isolated from the other. All three rectified dc outputs are wired together in parallel and the dc is sent via cable to the battery bank.

VAWT 

The stator is made by sandwiching the coils between two pieces of epoxy fiber glass board, the kind used in the manufacture of printed circuit boards. The top and bottom sheets, each 1/16 inch thick, are held together with bolts. They have reinforcing ribs added for stiffness. Power is brought out by means of stainless steel machine screws.  

You can download an avi video clip of the turbine working in a 4 mph breeze (caution! almost 4 megabytes!) At the time the clip was made, the turbine was charging the 12 volt battery bank at about 0.5 amp, or about 6 watts. I have taken some information on computing the energy in wind from a very interesting fellow named Charles Morrison in hopes of comparing it with the energy actually produced to estimate the turbine's efficiency. Maybe some expert readers will comment on the appropriateness of my calculations.

The power density, or watts per square meter, at sea level is .05472 * V^3

The product of the power density and the swept area in square meters equals the total energy available in the wind that passes through the turbine. Not all this energy can be extracted. In fact, the Betz limit states that only 59% can be extracted. So in the 4 mph wind, the total energy that could be extracted by a perfect wind turbine with a swept area of 4.46 square meters would be 9.2 watts. Since the turbine actually puts out about 6 watts, it is operating at an efficiency of about 65% at this time. This is extremely high by most standards. It makes me wonder about my methodology or the accuracy of my anemometer.

Here are some photos of the stator assembly.

Stator assembly The epoxy-fiberglass board, called G10 board, is available in various thicknesses. This photo shows how reinforcing ribs were glued to the sheet using epoxy.

 The stator was made in two halves. This facilitates experimentation by allowing for easy set-up and knock-down of various configurations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stator Coils

 

 

 

The two halves go together. Stainless steel machine screws are used as connection points for each coil.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Completed Stator

 

 

 

This is the underside showing the screw lugs which will connect the coils for 3-phase. Each phase consists of three coils wired in series. Starting with one coil and moving around the stator, a phase is every third coil wired together.

Top and bottom sheets are screwed together using stainless machine screws. Aluminum angle stock around the perimeter adds a great deal of stiffness to the G10 board.

 

 

 

 The schematic diagram below portrays the circuitry that rectifies the 3-phase ac into dc voltage. Each phase represents three coils in the stator. Each group of three series-wired coils is connected to a full wave bridge rectifier. The dc outputs of the rectifiers are parallel-wired together. To achieve higher voltage, the dc outputs of the three bridge circuits could be series-wired.

VAWT Rectifier
A wind turbine like this experiences large forces at the point where the airfoils are attached to the rotor arm. There are centrifugal forces which tend to pull the airfoils apart; there are twisting forces caused by the wind pushing more on the top half of the airfoil than on the bottom half. It is extremely important to make the connection at this point a solid one. In this design hardened steel tubing fits through holes in the ribs of the airfoils and in the rotor arm. The tubing has steel plates welded to each piece. These plates facilitate bolting the parts to the airfoil ribs and to the rotor arm. Two outside pieces, A and B, of tubing slide down over the center piece. Using bolts to hold the tubing in place makes it possible to easily disassemble and remove the airfoils from the rotor arm.

The sketch below may clarify the tubing arrangement and show how it fits on the rotor arm. Parts A and B are identical and are made of slightly larger tubing than C.

 Blade Mount

UPDATE March 6, 2007

The weather cooperated and gave me a day of steady winds 11-13 mph, and I was able to test the VAWT.

I watched the analog ammeter reach 5 amps during the gusts. Assuming the charge voltage was 14 volts, that represents about 70 watts of power produced. How does that compare with the theoretical formula? 

Watts = Conversion constant * Betz limit * efficiency * area in sq. m * wind^3

In a perfectly efficient turbine,

Watts = .05472 * 59% * 100% * 4.46 * 13^3 =316 watts 

The 70 watts actually produced suggests an efficiency of 22% at this windspeed, considerably less than the 65% computed above in the 4 mph wind. This certainly needs more investigation to better understand what is going on. 

tags:      

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit




1. Harold Westrich left...
Wednesday, 28 February 2007 1:53 pm

That is a great construction job ! ! I love to see other people proceeding with their own ideas. I see you as a person who has great self confidence.

you put a great deal of planning, materials, time, effort, research, into a project that had no guarantee of working, and followed through.

I hope that your calculations are correct, I love to see the "do-it-yourselfer" do better than manufacturers who have millions to work with! the underdog thing!! cool.

I am developing a type of savonius rotor that uses flags instead of rotors. It's cool too.

my e-mail is oct1113@hotmail.com please feel free to contact me about mechanical topics, but don't expect any help on electrical issues, I am not good with electric.

Please forward my e-mail address to the two men you said like to build experimental aircraft, I have a concept that I would like to give them.

Thank you for some very interesting reading.

Harold Westrich VW Bio Fuels


2. Radesh left...
Thursday, 12 April 2007 7:08 am

Very interesting project. I will get some of our studets to give it a go in the energy project.


3. Thomas Mcconnell left...
Monday, 23 April 2007 5:36 pm

Hi your wind project looks great and am very interested in your comments and stats you may already know this but I read somewhere that if you pour a mixture of carbon powder and fine iron fileings mixed with a quick setting resin like car body fillers and fill up the space in the middle of your coils this is supposed to greatly improve the efficiency of the generation.

  • Regards

    • Tom


4. father-52 left...
Thursday, 24 May 2007 2:53 pm

The setting of wings is very important. You can try modify the angles of wings. It's possible at 4 mph wind the angles are good but at stronger wings those are not good. Try multifarious of angles. Sorry, I haven't good English!

father-52 from Hungary (gelleri.laszlo@monornet.hu)


5. Roger Lennard left...
Tuesday, 2 October 2007 4:35 pm

I've just come across your web page and was encouraged to see other DIYers generating electricity. A few months ago I made myself a neodymium magnet generator out of 16 small round magnets with 16 coils of very thin wire (29 SWG?). I can light a 60W mains bulb with it when I connect it to my cycle trainer. My measured voltage was over 150V. I'd really like to make a VAWT now but am having problems working out the values for magnets, wire gauge, number of turns etc to give me a generator that gives good outpur at low revs. How did you work it out? Keep updating your pages. Good luck.


6. R White left...
Wednesday, 19 December 2007 10:24 am

Good job. I think your efficiency calculation has a math error:

Power density = .05472*4^3*4.46 = 15.61, not 9.2. This still gives an efficiency of .384, which is still very good for a vertical axis turbine.

Can't exceed the Betz limit.


7. Dennis left...
Friday, 25 January 2008 5:11 am

I have always been fascinated by the VAWT. With that being said have you considered making the air foils taller while decreasing the overall diameter. This would increase RPMs while the increased heigth would maintain torque. I would think this might enable you to get rid of the gearing.

I have seen similar air foil designs with the radiused leading edge, however, I'm currently working on a 3 blade VAWT using blades (air foils) that more closely resembles that of a air craft wing. I am also working on a design that emcompasses 2 VAWT, one inside the other. The outer foils spinning the mags while the inner spins the coils. Realizing this would mean the use of slip rings and brushes for the coils.

Living in an area of the country where there is only a very limited amount of available wind energy, something tells me that the twin desing might produce well in low wind conditions. Maybe the use of a centrifigal brake of some sort to stop or slow the inner foils during high wind operation. Whi knows...the work continues!


8. Tom Woods left...
Friday, 25 January 2008 8:56 pm :: http://altenergy.blog-city.com/

Dennis, I am sad to say my blades are lying in a pile on the ground. We have had several fierce wind storms and the last one ripped apart the wooden cross piece that held the blades in place. I don't think I'd want to make my blades much taller than they were. It becomes hard to build them strong enough. I think you will be better off than me with your three blades. When I rebuild, I will make three.


9. conntaxman left...
Sunday, 3 February 2008 10:50 am

I am building a vawt something like the one you show.Different H X W. and larger mangnets.I tried to time the rpm's from your vidio.It came out to about 16 rpm a miniute.Is that correct. Have you tried to place your vains closer then 8 ft? If so what were the results. I made my 1 wing so far out of 12" and 10" round heating duck pipe [21 ga.It is pre rolled.LOL Have you ever did a 3 wing? tks Johnny


10. Tom Woods left...
Tuesday, 5 February 2008 9:11 pm :: http://altenergy.blog-city.com/

16 RPM is about right for a gentle breeze. 60 RPM is common for moderate winds. I think a 3-wing unit would be better than mine in strong winds. I've not tried it, however. The large diameter is not helpful in high winds. In one really big windstorm the rotor was quite erratic in its behavior. Shortening the diameter to about 5 feet increased the rpms and improved the performance in high winds.

My VAWT is now deceased. The last gale split the wood crossmember and sent the wings flying into a heap. When I rebuild, I intend to keep the diameter about 5 or 6 feet and have three blades instead of two. -Tom


11. Bluetooth left...
Monday, 26 January 2009 11:50 am :: http://bluetooth-portal.com

That cool rotor, but i am finding for schemes, does anybody know source?


12. wind turbine | wind energy left...
Tuesday, 14 April 2009 5:05 am :: http://highplainswindandsolar.com/

Solar panels are use to make renewable energy from sun,Most places in the high plains have plenty of solar energy available to meet some, or all of your needs. A solar system is ideal for urban areas where building codes prevent a <a href="http://highplainswindandsolar.com/">wind turbine</a>.


13. Windturbine left...
Saturday, 22 August 2009 5:13 am :: http://www.windturbinestar.com

A good article for DIY vertical wind turbine. I have some advices on the blade shape design. This blade is the tradational shape. Actually there are many new blade design for Vertical wind turbines. You may see the Aeolos or helix websites. They have good design on the blades.


14. dhaslam left...
Monday, 21 September 2009 10:25 am

This type of turbine will work much better if the return side is completely covered by a flap and it is possible to arrange them that the wind is increased on the push side. I am planning to make one that is a lot wider but also taller but with wind intake controlled by the flaps. I wonder how important the size of the blades is. Only about 50% of the wind force can be used but I wonder if there is a formula for the optimum blade size to achieve maximum output. .


15. Horizontal wind turbines left...
Tuesday, 22 September 2009 4:21 am :: http://www.highplainswindandsolar.com

Horizontal axis wind turbines (HAWTs) are the most common wind turbines used. Consisting of one to three blades that spin around a rotor, these turbines look like giant propellers jutting from the landscape atop an aerodynamic tower on a hillside. Wind passes through the blades, affecting the pressure on either side. This pressure creates a lift force that causes the blades to rotate around the rotor. The rotor converts the power of the wind into usable energy. Both cost effective and efficient, these turbines harness the power of the winds that blow several meters above the ground.


16. dhaslam left...
Tuesday, 22 September 2009 4:47 am

The problem with horizontal systems is that they have to cope with all wind speeds and produce practically nothing in ordinary wind conditions. I want a system that produces .5 to 2 KW works in 3-5ms prevailing winds but gradually closes down at higher wind speeds. The large commercial systems cope with varying wind speeds by changing the angle of the blades but this is not possible for small systems.